Markets suggest Bill or Hillary Clinton being held in contempt of Congress by Feb 28 is becoming LESS likely, with the ‘No’ outcome rising from 31.9% to 43.5%. This shift appears to defy recent news of a House committee advancing contempt resolutions.

Asymmetry Analysis

The 7-day trend for ‘No’ was slightly negative (-0.65%), indicating a marginal increase in the likelihood of contempt. However, the 24-hour trend saw a strong reversal, with ‘No’ rising significantly by 11.57 percentage points. This strong asymmetry suggests traders are either dismissing the recent committee votes as insufficient or are betting against a full chamber vote by Feb 28. The reversal began around the time the news snippets started to emerge, indicating a direct counter-reaction from the market to the committee’s actions.

Why This Matters

This divergence between political action (committee advancing resolutions) and market sentiment (decreasing likelihood of contempt) presents a critical research opportunity. Markets appear to be pricing in a specific interpretation of the procedural hurdles or political will, offering a counter-narrative to official statements and initial news reports.

What To Investigate

Building on House.gov’s reporting, journalists should verify: 1. Contact House Oversight Committee staff: What are the precise procedural steps required for a full House vote on contempt, and what is the realistic timeline to complete them by February 28? 2. Interview constitutional law experts: What are the legal precedents and historical success rates for contempt of Congress charges against former high-ranking officials like the Clintons? 3. Poll congressional leadership offices (both parties): What is the political will for a full chamber vote, considering the bipartisan committee support for advancing the resolutions, but also potential internal opposition (as reported by CNN regarding Pelosi)? 4. Review Department of Justice guidelines: Under what circumstances does the DOJ typically pursue criminal contempt of Congress referrals, and what impact could a potential referral have?

Context

Contempt of Congress proceedings, particularly against high-profile figures, are often politically charged and rarely lead to swift, full enforcement. The market’s skepticism could be rooted in this historical context, suggesting traders are looking beyond the initial procedural steps to the ultimate outcome within the specified timeframe.

Confidence & Caveats

This analysis is based on predictive market data and publicly available news. Political markets are subject to rapid changes, and historical accuracy for specific procedural outcomes can vary. The 24-hour move of 11.57% is substantial, but the market’s open interest of $1,616 means even moderate trading volume ($6,646 in 24h) can cause amplified price movements. The ‘Dead Cat Bounce’ pattern is also ambiguous and has a historical success rate of approximately 35%.


Related News Sources


Market Metadata

  • Market: Will Bill or Hillary Clinton be held in contempt of Congress by Feb 28?
  • Market ID: 1236839
  • Token ID: 73323801432650285263795085880202709798769924385326923251387498741085795340964
  • Quality Score: 6/9
  • Classification: Market Shift
  • 7-Day Trend: $-0.01
  • 24-Hour Trend: $0.12
  • Current Price: $0.43
  • Volume (24h): $6,647
  • Open Interest: $1,617

Data sourced from Polymarket prediction markets. Analysis generated by PredSignal AI.